Howell v. McAuliffe
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Dissent · MimsJustice Mims
Because the Court's holding that petitioners have standing is not supported by our precedents limiting the extraordinary remedy of mandamus, and because the General Assembly by statute has established the standing requirement and mechanism for challenges to voter registration, I must reluctantly dissent.
I. Standing is Jurisdictional and Fundamental to the Limited Role of the Judiciary
The question of standing can be technical and esoteric. Yet it is fundamental to the proper function of the judiciary. In fact, the doctrine of standing implicates our very jurisdiction and our limited role…
Also in this document: Dissent · Powell.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.