Legal Opinion
Warren v. Craven
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 2012No. 38657PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Judge.
John F. Warren appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Warren contends the district court erred in its denial and the writ is warranted because of violations of his state and federal constitutional due process rights in the underlying criminal proceedings and in being denied parole. For reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Warren is currently serving the indeterminate portion of his sentence on a conviction of felony driving under the influence, for conduct occurring in 2008. Warren completed serving the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Mark Edward Allen, IIIIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- James Neil Moen v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- James T. Haas v. Olivia CravenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
- Rodgers v. ValleyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023