Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Geer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 7, 2009No. 071805; A137964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Wife appeals from a judgment of dismissal, which was predicated on the trial court’s sua sponte determination that there was a lack of personal jurisdiction, ORCP 21 A(2), with respect to respondent husband, who has never appeared or filed any response in this matter. Wife contends, and we agree, that the trial court erred in rendering that determination. See Osburn v. Pace, 55 Or App 492, 494, 638 P2d 497 (1982) (“The trial court’s sua sponte dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendant was error. The defense may not be raised on the court’s own motion.”).

Reversed and remanded.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Osburn v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Marriage of GeerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009