Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Aminta Flores, Cross-Appellants v. Edinburg Consolidated Independent School District, Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 17, 1984No. 83-2195Published

1Concurrence

GARZA, Circuit Judge,

specially concurring:

Although Judge Higginbotham presents an excellent argument for the proposition that the Texas law of res judicata precludes the section 1983 action before us, I disagree with the majority’s interpretation of Texas law and believe that the Texas courts would not find appellee’s claim precluded. Although I concur in the result reached by the majority, I would reverse this case on the merits because the appellee failed to establish that his section 1983 claim occurred as a result of an official policy, custom, or usage of the school district.1…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Donald L. Hays, Jr., and Michael C. Potter, Cross-Appellants v. Jefferson County, Kentucky, Wilbur Bilyeu and Russell McDaniel Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API