Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Furst, Edwards Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hill County; C. M. Smithdeal, Judge. Action by Furst, Edwards & Co. against W. E. Jackson. From a judgment allowing plaintiffs to dismiss, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRasbury, J.

Appellees sued appellant upon a promissory note for $1,500, signed by appellant and payable to appellees. Appellant answered by general demurrer, general denial, and specially that appellant was induced to sign the note sued upon by the false representations of appellees in reference to the state of accounts between appellant and appellees, and which were relied upon by appellant. The specific claim was made that appellees were engaged in buying and selling cotton in both the United States and Europe, while appellant was engaged in a like business in Hillsboro and surrounding country, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Short v. HepburnTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. HuntsmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Wolf v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Commercial Investment Trust, Inc. v. SmartTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Apache Cotton Oil & Mfg. Co. v. Watkins & KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API