Legal Opinion

Jakobi v. Gorman

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 16, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action of replevin by Leo C. Jakobi and another against John J. Gorman, sheriff, to recover property levied on by defendant. The property was claimed by one Scheick and others, who moved to be substituted as defendants. Order of the general term of the city court, (21 N. Y. Supp. 466,) affirming an order at special term allowing the substitution. Plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

Upon a judgment in an action by Scheick against Schmidt, Gorman, as. sheriff, levied on property in the possession of Schmidt. The plaintiffs herein made claim to the property, and brought replevin for its recovery; and thereupon Scheick, Offerman, *763and Selje executed a bond of indemnity to the sheriff. The motion is by these indemnitors’ to be substituted as defendants in place of Gorman, the sheriff. An order of substitution at special term was affirmed by the general term of the city court, and from that order of affirmance an appeal is taken to us. The order of substitution was entered the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . DavidsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Keller v. FeldmannNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kollmeyer Ex Rel. Kollmeyer v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Cohen v. GormanThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  3. Clemmons v. GormanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  4. Terhune v. DunnCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898
  5. Terhune v. DunnCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API