Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 26-87, (1982)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided March 10, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL B. JACKSON, Secretary Department of Industry, Labor andHuman Relations

You ask whether a "sharecropping agreement" between an employer and a migrant worker violates the Wisconsin Migrant Law, secs.103.90-103.97, Stats. You indicate that some employers have offered sharecropping agreements to migrant workers under which the workers are paid in crops harvested rather than in cash.

It is assumed that the grower furnishes the land and supplies and keeps general supervision over the land where the crop is being grown. Such a worker is called a "cropper." "A cropper is as much a servant as if…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. State Ex Rel. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n of Milwaukee v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. La FolletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API