Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allen v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 1950No. 16306Published

1DissentStukeS, Justice

I regret that I have a different view of this case from that expressed in the opinion by Mr. Justice Taylor. I would consider the appeal on its merits rather than dismiss it, and dispose of it as will be indicated.

It has long been established in this jurisdiction that in the case of a tort two causes of action may arise, one for actual damages on account of the negligence of the defendant and another and independent cause of action for punitive damages if the tortious act of the defendant was accompanied by wilfulness or recklessness. This state of the law occasioned the enactment in 1898 (22…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. J.H. Sheridan Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Francisco v. Chicago & A. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Hayes v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Key, Admx. v. Charleston W.C. Rwy. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  5. Johnson v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API