Goodwin v. State

Appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, in which he claims to have suffered ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to object to or otherwise preserve for review the imposition of an “interrupted” sentence.

This court previously found Appellant’s trial counsel failed to preserve the issue of the imposition of an interrupted sentence. Goodwin v. State, 752 So.2d 689 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Because Appellant’s sentence is erroneous, his claim of ineffective assistance…