Legal Opinion

Rinderer v. Keeven

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 1980No. 79-544PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE JONES

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, Eric and Sandra Rinderer, brought suit for a declaratory judgment and for preliminary and permanent injunctions against defendant, Leonard Keeven, who, they alleged, was obstructing their use of two implied easements over his property. Defendant denied the existence of the implied easements, claiming alternatively that no implied easements had been created and that if any easement had existed, it had been extinguished by an agreement between defendant and plaintiffs’ predecessor in title that was known and acceptable to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. Ladies of Loretto, WheatonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  2. Speer v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. Valley City Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Dee v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  5. Miller v. SchmitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. O'Hara v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Bromley v. Lambert and Son, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Shive v. SchaeferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Seiber v. LeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API