Griffith v. Griffith

DAVIS, Commissioner.

In this alimony and divorce proceeding the defendant husband attacks that portion of the judgment which relates to settlement of the property rights of the parties, asserting that (1) the judgment violates KRS 403.060 in divesting the husband of fee simple title in real estate; (2) the alimony award is excessive; and (3) the husband furnished consideration for his interest in the real estate, so that KRS 403.065 is not applicable.

After some twenty years of marriage these litigants came to the divorce court, each seeking a divorce and custody of their then eight-year-old…