Matter of Yaccarino
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Dissent
O’HEEN and GARIBALDI, JJ.,
dissenting.
We dissent from the disposition of the Court primarily on the basis of the Mitigating Circumstances set forth in Part IV of the non-disbarment opinion of the equally-divided Disciplinary Eeview Board. Those mitigating circumstances (with a few sentences deleted) are published herewith. We add only these observations.
We often reiterate that protection of the public, not punishment of the attorney, is the purpose of attorney discipline. In re Goldstein, 97 N.J. 545, 548 (1984). As a recipient of a judicial pension, respondent can never represent a client in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Matter of KotokSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Matter of StierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Matter of GoldsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.