Legal Opinion

Haynes Ambulance Service, Inc. v. State of Alabama

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 1, 1994No. 93-6419PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we decide a narrow issue of statutory interpretation involving the Medicare and Medicaid Acts and certain provisions within these statutes that create a health care program for statutorily defined persons known as qualified Medicare beneficiaries (QMBs). The Medicaid Act requires state Medicaid agencies to make funds available for Medicare cost sharing payments for certain medical services on behalf of those qualified for the program. The federal government pays 80% of the Medicare rate to providers of Medicare Part B services to QMBs, with the state cost sharing payment covering…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Medical Society v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. New York City Health And Hospitals Corporation v. Cesar A. PeralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Rehabilitation Ass'n of Virginia, Inc. v. KozlowskiDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dameron Physicians Medical Group, Inc. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
  2. Haynes Ambulance Service, Inc. v. The State Of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Stohler v. MenkeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1997
  4. Stohler v. MenkeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API