Crefeld Mills v. Goddard
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
This was an action upon contract: by the Crefeld Mills against Wan on N. Goddard and Frederick N. Goddard. The jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff, and I he defendants moved for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
Upon this motion for a new tidal the defendants principally rely upon a review of the ruling at (be trial adverse to their contention in respect to the invalidity of the contract upon which the suit is founded, this defense having been overruled pro forma, in order that it might be deliberately considered upon motion for a new trial in the event of a verdict against, die defendants. The complaint alleges a cause of action in behalf of a corporation of the state of Connecticut, for a breach on the part of Ihe defendants of a contract by w hich the plaintiff was to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Providence Steam & Gas Pipe Co. v. ConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Neuchatel Asphalte Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- A. Booth & Co. v. WeigandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Johnson v. New York Breweries Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Western Electrical Co. v. PickettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Goddard v. Crefield MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- A. Booth & Co. v. WeigandUtah Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.