Commonwealth v. Garden
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1DissentCowin, J.
(dissenting, with whom Greaney and Spina, JJ., join). I agree with the reasoning of the court except for its holding that the trunk of the automobile was beyond the permissible scope of the search. In my view, the odor of burnt marijuana, without more, provides probable cause to search any area of the vehicle that naught reasonably contain marijuana, including the trunk. As the court acknowledges, there is a split of authority on the issue. In my view, we should follow what I believe is the more persuasive reasoning of those cases that permit such a search in these circumstances.
As a general…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commonwealth v. CastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Wimberly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.