Legal Opinion
Granberry v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 2, 2007No. 5D06-3988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
967 So.2d 1044 (2007)
Samuel D. GRANBERRY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D06-3988.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
November 2, 2007.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Henry T. Swann, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
MONACO, J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in giving the forcible felony exclusionary charge described in section 776.041(1), Florida Statutes (2002), as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Cleveland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Cardenas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Granberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Grier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sipple v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- State v. GranberrySupreme Court of Florida · 2009