Legal Opinion

Diebold v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided October 26, 2010No. Docket No. 24675-07UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOROTHY R. DIEBOLD, TRANSFEREE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Diebold v. Comm'r

Docket No. 24675-07

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2010-238; 2010 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 271; 100 T.C.M. (CCH) 370;

October 26, 2010, Filed

Decision will be entered for petitioner.

A. Duane Webber, Jaclyn Pampel, Catlin A. Urban, Summer Austin, and Ryan J. Kelly, for petitioner.

John R. Mikalchus, Frederick C. Mutter, and Jessica R. Browde, for respondent.

GOEKE, Judge.

GOEKE

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

GOEKE, Judge: In a notice of liability respondent determined that Dorothy R. Diebold…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SternSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Mysse v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  3. UNITED STATES v. McCOMBSCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  5. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Tucson, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diebold Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Salus Mundi Foundation v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API