Westinghouse v. New York Air Brake Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
Both parties have appealed from the decree in this cause, and their appeals present the single question of the amount of the recovery to which the complainants are entitled in consequence of the infringement by the defendant of the complainants’ patent No. 376,837 for an improvement in automatic air-brake mechanism, known as the “quick-action” triple valve. The patent contains six claims, and the interlocutory decree adjudged that three of these claims were valid and had been infringed by the defendant, and ordered a perpetual injunction, together with an accounting of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. v. Consolidated Safety Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Manufacturing Co. v. CowingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. E. C. Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Dunn Mfg. Co. v. Standard Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.