United Security Title Insurance v. Moskowitz

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The relevant facts of this case are concisely stated in the opinion of the court below, as follows: “Plain tiff insured the title to five [six?] houses to five [six?] different purchasers. It sues to recover the taxes against those houses for the year 1923, alleging that during the whole of that year the defendants were the owners. When it was discovered that the taxes for the year 1923 had not been paid, plaintiff, having insured the new owners against those taxes, deemed itself bound by its policies and, for the purpose of protecting the insured, paid the taxes and now…