Legal Opinion
Indiana Horse Racing Commission v. Edmund W. Martin, Jr.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 2013No. 49A02-1206-PL-512PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether Edmund Martin (“Martin”) participated in pari-mutuel horse racing and was therefore required to be licensed pursuant to Indiana Code section 4-31-6-1 and 71 Indiana Administrative Code rule 5.5-1-1. The Indiana Horse Racing Commission (“the IHRC”) appeals the Marion Superior Court’s decision to vacate its order excluding Martin from its racetracks because he failed to obtain a license in 2010.
Concluding that Martin did indeed participate in horse racing, we reverse the trial court’s order setting aside the IHRC’s decision and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dimeo v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Andrianova v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pierce v. State Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Indianapolis Downs, LLC v. INDIANA HORSE RACING COM'NIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kroger Co. v. Plan Commission of PlainfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Insurance v. Jeffrey A. SchumakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Brookston Resource, Inc. v. State of Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024
- L.M. Zeller, Individually, and D/B/A Zeller Elevator Company, LEO Mark Zeller, Louis M. Zeller III, Andrew M. Boeglin, and Matthew Boeglin v. Indiana Fire Prevention (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016