People v. Gould
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to reckless endangerment in the first degree. We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in accepting his guilty plea without a sufficient factual allocution. Because defendant pleaded guilty to a crime lesser than the crimes initially charged, a factual allocution was not necessary (see, People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 108; People v Clairborne, 29 NY2d 950, 951; People v Nunez, 177 AD2d 656).
We have reviewed the remaining contention raised by defendant and conclude that it is without merit (see, People v *990Tay…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ClairborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. MayersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. NunezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. TiradoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Plato v. MorrisseyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- People v. AcoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001