Legal Opinion

People v. Gould

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to reckless endangerment in the first degree. We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in accepting his guilty plea without a sufficient factual allocution. Because defendant pleaded guilty to a crime lesser than the crimes initially charged, a factual allocution was not necessary (see, People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 108; People v Clairborne, 29 NY2d 950, 951; People v Nunez, 177 AD2d 656).

We have reviewed the remaining contention raised by defendant and conclude that it is without merit (see, People v *990Tay…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. ClairborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People v. MayersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. NunezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. TiradoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Plato v. MorrisseyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  5. People v. AcoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API