Legal Opinion

M.D. & Son Contracting, Inc. v. American Properties, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is well settled that whether or not to relieve a party from a judgment or order entered on default is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court. (CPLR 5015; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v Andersen & Co., 60 NY2d 693.) The party seeking the relief must advance a reasonable excuse for the default and demonstrate the meritoriousness of its claim. (Supra.) Here the court at IAS did not abuse its discretion. Plaintiff was present at a status conference at which the J.H.O. presiding directed that the discovery demands be met by a certain date. Thereafter, subsequent orders of the IAS…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. FID. & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Vanessa M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Waite v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Fierro v. FierroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Little Flower Children's Services v. Vernon J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Credit Car Leasing Corp. v. Elan Group Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API