Legal Opinion
United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. Millard
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 26, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis, Illinois; the Hon. B. H. Canby, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, P. J.
The appellee was insured-in the appellant company, he being an attorney by occupation, in the sum of $25 per week against loss of time, not exceeding twenty-six consecutive weeks, resulting from bodily injuries effected through means as aforesaid, other than such as shall result in the loss of one or both hands, feet or -eyes, which shall, independently of all other causes, immediately, wholly and continuously disable him from transacting any and every kind of business pertaining to his occupation above stated. The policy further provides that “ the insurance under this certificate shall not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Rice v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Saveland v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Stapp v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wall v. Continental Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Fidelity & Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. MountcastleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Rayburn v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Supreme Tent of the Knights of Maccabees of the World v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
- Coles v. New York Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903