Legal Opinion · Concurrence

C.E. v. DeKalb County Department of Human Resources

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 13, 2015No. 1140290Published

1ConcurrenceShaw, Justice

The parental rights of the petitioner, C.E., were terminated as to his child. C.E. appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which unanimously affirmed the trial court’s order without an opinion. Ex parte C.E. (No. 2130591, December 5, 2014), — So.3d - (Ala.Civ.App.2014) (table). C.E. has petitioned for certiorari review, which this Court today denies.

I concur to deny the petition, because I do not believe that it demonstrates any probability of merit. See Rule 39(f), Ala. R.App. P. C.E. argues in his petition that there existed a viable alternative to the termination of his parental rights,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. KGS Steel, Inc. v. McInishSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. A.E.T. v. Limestone County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. A.F. v. Madison County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API