Legal Opinion

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Nanocopoeia, LLC

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 10, 2023No. 0:22-cv-01283Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Case No. 22-cv-1283 (KMM/JFD) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Nanocopoeia, LLC, Defendant. Since 2006, Plaintiff Bristol-Myers Squibb Company has manufactured Sprycel, a drug that is used to treat certain types of leukemia. Sprycel contains the active ingredient dasatinib in the crystalline monohydrate form. Bristol-Myers has two patents that claim the crystalline form of dasatinib: the ‘725 patent and ‘103 patent.1 Defendant Nanocopoeia, a specialty pharmaceutical company based in Minneapolis, . Bristol-Myers filed this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. R+L Carriers, Inc. v. DriverTech LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Samuel Zean v. Fairview Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API