City of Los Angeles v. Federal Aviation Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Aviation Administration has approved the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport’s plan to double the size of its terminal. This being a “major federal action” the FAA prepared an environmental impact statement which asserts, inter alia, that building' a larger terminal won’t materially affect the number of people who use the airport. “ ‘[I]f you build it, they will come,’ ” the appellants parry and scoff at their opponents for the “ ‘[Air] Field of Dreams’ conclusion: ‘if you don’t build it, they will come anyway.’ ” Blue brief at 5-6.
I
For years the FAA and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Public Citizen, Inc., Aviation Consumer Action Project, and Families of Pan-Am 103/lockerbie v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v. Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc. v. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, Attorney General, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- State of Illinois Ex Rel. Scott v. ButterfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. FaaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- People v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- City of Los Angeles v. Federal Aviation Administration, Burbank Glendale Pasadena Airport Authority, Respondent-Intervenor. City of Burbank v. Federal Aviation Administration, Burbank Glendale Pasadena Airport Authority, Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998