Legal Opinion

Neunz v. Summit County Children Services Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1978No. 77-864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether appellant can recover, from the estate of appel-*220lee’s inepmpetent daughter, the cost of the support appellant provided for the child prior to the creation of her guárdianship estate.1

R.C. Chapter 5153 serves as the statutory authority for the establishment and operation of county children services boards. In particular, R. C. 5153.16 delimits the powers and duties of county children services boards and provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

“The county children services board, subject to the rules and standards of the department of public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woods v. MasonNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Washington v. BeitelCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conaway v. Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API