Peters v. Hopkins
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
. Hearing on an' appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference case. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shepard
This appeal arises out of an interference between applications of Isaac S. Dement, Herbert Hopkins, and Heber C. Peters, respectively, for a patent for-an improvement in adding machines. Dement’s application was filed January 9, 1904, that of Peters, April 14, 1905, and that of Hopkins, April 9, 1906. A preliminary statement was filed by Peters in conform; ity with Patent Office rule 110, which requires that each party to an interference shall file a preliminary statement under oath, showing, among other facts, the date of original conception of the invention, the date upon which a drawing of…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Samuel S. Kistler v. Neill WeberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969