Legal Opinion
Findrilakis v. Secretary of the Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 16, 1973No. Civ. C-72-801, C-71 2429PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PECKHAM, District Judge.
Named plaintiffs, in these two actions which raise identical issues, applicants for tenancy in several housing projects in Gilroy, Santa Cruz, Marina, and Morgan Hill, California, and the non-profit sponsor of one of those projects seek to have a circular issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development HM No. 4442.18 declared inconsistent with the National Housing Act and to enjoin its enforcement. The defendants in C-72-801 have moved for summary judgment. The facts are not in dispute. The circular sets forth as a mandatory requirement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James T. Lynn, Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Mary Fletcher v. Housing Authority of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Mandina v. LynnDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
- Boyd v. LefrakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Winningham v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.