State v. Stanley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*333EXUM, Justice.
The dispositive issue in this appeal concerns the propriety of permitting the jury to consider whether the murder committed by defendant was “especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel,” as those terms are used in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-2000(e)(9). After a careful review of the facts and our prior decisions, we conclude this aggravating factor should not have been submitted to the jury. Since this is the only aggravating circumstance submitted and there is no evidence of any other which could have been submitted, we vacate the judgment imposing a sentence of death and in lieu…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. BaconSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.