Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Pitman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1924No. 15149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In determining the questions raised by the appellant, Joe McMurry, we shall not pass on the motion to dismiss the appeal filed herein, but it must not be understood thereby that the questions raised by said motion are determined adversely to the contention made in support thereof. We treat the case as if the right to prosecute error in this court were conceded to the appellant.

Wilson S. Pitman was and is at all times hereinafter mentioned a minor and a citizen by blood of the Creek Tribe of Indians. Joe McMurry, the appellant herein, was his guardian, and in this opinion will be referred to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Potts v. RubesamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Clark v. De GraffenreidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Perry v. ShaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. In Re Cuellar's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Torres v. HinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API