Hudson v. Wright
Alabama Court of Appeals
Appeal from Gadsden City Court. Heard before Hon. John H. Disque. Trover by Harvey Wright against F. N. Hudson. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Counsel discuss the rulings on the pleading, but in view of the opinion it is not deemed necessary to set them out. It is insisted that the landlord had a lien superior to plaintiff and hence, is entitled to the affirmative charge. — Sec. 4743, Code 1907; Hudson v. Wright, 1 Ala.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Gadsden City Court. Heard before Hon. John H. Disque. Trover by Harvey Wright against F. N. Hudson. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Counsel discuss the rulings on the pleading, but in view of the opinion it is not deemed necessary to set them out. It is insisted that the landlord had a lien superior to plaintiff and hence, is entitled to the affirmative charge. — Sec. 4743, Code 1907; Hudson v. Wright, 1 Ala. App. 433; Faust v. Bain Bros., 52 South. 743; Farrer v. Wooley, 43 South. 144; J or dam, v. Lindsey, 132 Ala. 567. This being- true, the inferior lien holder…
1Opinion of the CourtWalkeb, P. J.
By the ruling made on the former appeal in this case (Hudson v. Wright, 164 Ala. 298, 51 South. 389, 137 Am. St. Rep. 55) it was determined that the plaintiff, shoAvn by the pleadings in the case as they stood at that time to have been a subtenant of J. T; Wright, Avas not bound by the result of the attachment suit brought by the defendant against J. T. Wright, Avith Avhich the plaintiff was not in any Avay connected.
On one aspect of the evidence developed on the trial of the case Avhich is under review on this appeal, the appellee was not a subtenant of J. T. Wright, but made the crops in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hardwick v. HardwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Hudson v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Hudson v. WrightAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911