Legal Opinion

Applied Signal & Image Technology, Inc. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 14, 2003No. CIV.CCB-02-1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BLAKE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Applied Signal and Image Technology, Inc. (“ASIT”) has sued Har-leysville Mutual Insurance Co. (“Harleys-ville”) for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defending against a suit filed by Joseph Hejl, a shareholder and former corporate officer of ASIT. ASIT moves for partial summary judgment on the liability of Harleysville for such fees and costs. Harleysville has filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. This matter has been fully briefed and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, the court will grant ASIT’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Jay Lawrence Halperin v. Abacus Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Terra Nova Insurance Company, Ltd. v. 900 Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty And Surety Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  3. Explorer Insurance Company v. Nagel Farm Service, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  4. Osprey Consulting I, Inc. v. Westport Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  5. United States Liability Insurance Company v. KrawatskyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API