Shishido v. SIU-Pacific District-PMA Pension Plan
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW
SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.
This is an action brought by a retired merchant seaman to increase pension benefits. Cross motions for summary judgment were heard by this court on October 14, 1983. All parties having appeared at said hearing, written and oral arguments from all parties having been considered, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Pension Plan’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; defendant Union’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to defendant Union and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Angelo E. Tafoya v. Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bolton v. Construction Laborers' Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Bolton v. Construction Laborers' Pension Trust For Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Central Tool Co. v. International Ass'n of Machinists National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan ACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Central Tool Company v. International Association of MacHinists National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan A, Central Tool Company v. International Association of MacHinists National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan ACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.