Irving v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

At a former day, this cause was affirmed, and the motion for rehearing overruled (157 S. W. 752), because the assignments of error did not comply with the requirements of amended rules 24 and 25 (142 S. W. xii). Afterwards, and during that term of the court, we reconsidered our action and caused the order overruling the motion for rehearing to be set aside. Our action in reinstating the motion was based upon the authorities of Hough v. Fink, 141 S. W. 147, Southern Pine Humber Co. v. Arnold, 139 S. W. 917, and Olivarri v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 116 S. W. 392, which hold that a…