Legal Opinion

Duke v. Committee on Grievances of the Supreme Court

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 9, 1936No. 6362Published

1Opinion of the Court

82 F.2d 890 (1936)

DUKE

v.

COMMITTEE ON GRIEVANCES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

No. 6362.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided March 9, 1936.

Jesse C. Duke, of Washington, D. C., pro se.

Lucian H. Vandoren and Charles F. Wilson, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, GRONER, and STEPHENS, Associate Justices.

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

An appeal by Jesse C. Duke from an order of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia disbarring him from practice as an attorney at law of that court.

The facts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. In re PryorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API