Legal Opinion

Wilde v. Preuss

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the district court for Cuming county. Tried below before Powers, J. cited; Strine v. Kaufman, 12 Neb.,. 423; Raymond v. Strine, 14 Id., 236; Oleghorn v. Waterman, 16 Id., 227; Lincoln Brick & Tile Works v. Hall, 27 Id., 877; Muldoon v. Levi, 25 Id., 457.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This suit was brought by the defendant in error against Charles H. Wilde before a justice of the peace of Cuming county to recover the amount of a promissory note. After the action was commenced the trial was postponed by the justice several times at the request of both parties; the last adjournment being to May 14, 1889. The defendant’s attorney, Mr. Franse, filed an affidavit denying the execution and delivery of the note.

On the 14th day of May, 1889, a judgmeutwas rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the action for $85.45. Four days later the defendant filed a motion to set the judgment *791as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clapp v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. BurrillNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API