Legal Opinion

Pure Oil Co. v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1931No. 3989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the case as above).

The points chiefly for consideration are (1) as to the validity of the guardianship proceedings, and (2) as to the termination of the period of the lease as it was fixed in the order of the probate court and the written lease. In considering the validity of the guardianship proceedings the essential facts in view are that at the time of the appoint ment of tlie guardian of the person and estate of Henry Clark he was both a person of unsound mind, by judicial inquisition and adjudication, and a person over nineteen but under twenty-one years of age. And it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Francklyn v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. St. Paul Sanitarium v. CrimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. ClarkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API