Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1982No. 8126SC720PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs argue that they should be allowed to collect from defendants their judgments against Glenn, because defendants breached their contract to procure liability insurance for Glenn, even though defendants had no formal notice of the prior suit. We hold that the default judgments are evidence of a loss for which defendants may have been liable and that the trial judge committed error in dismissing the action.

In North Carolina, “if an insurance agent or broker undertakes to procure for another insurance against a designated risk, the law imposes upon him the duty to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Gothberg v. NemerovskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Mayo v. American Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Dixie Fire Insurance Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Insurance Co. v. . Bonding Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. R-Anell Homes, Inc. v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Henry v. Michael P. Guastella & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Bigger v. Vista Sales & Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Simpson v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API