Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chenault

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 18, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Reversing.

The appellant, whom we will call the plaintiff, has appealed from a judgment against it in favor of the appellees, whom we will call the defendants, for $58,000.00 for land condemned for railroad purposes. Seeking to get better grades and easier curves, plaintiff relocated its railroad. Alleging that it had been unable to purchase from the defendants the needed land, it instituted this proceeding. Commissioners were appointed and assessed the damages thus:

Yalue of land taken................................................$6,400.00

Fencing....…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Louisville Nashville Rr. Co. v. Burnam, TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Potts v. Penn. S. V. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Coleman v. HangerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1924
  5. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. Napier's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kentucky Hydro-Electric Co. v. ReisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Manns v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Creech v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API