Legal Opinion

Moen v. Aitken

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Plaintiff was employed as carpenter by defendant, a contractor engaged in the construction of a five-story apartment house in the City of Portland. Shortly prior to time of injury plaintiff, who was working on an elevator shaft on the fifth floor, was ordered by defendant’s foreman, Miller, to go above and “put some two by fours between the ceiling joists and the roof joists” preparatory to lathing and plastering the elevator shaft. This shaft was about seven feet square. In order to accomplish the work it was necessary for the plaintiff to stand on some staging or scaffolding in the shaft…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Camenzind v. Freeland Furniture Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Bottig v. PolskyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. McGrath v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hise v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Howard v. Foster & Kleiser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Schmidt v. Multnomah Operating Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. California Delta Farms, Inc v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Robbins v. IrwinOregon Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API