Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J.M.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 18, 1999No. 10-98-286-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

2Per curiam

This Court does not have jurisdiction of this appeal because a final judgment has not been signed. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Only the procedural facts related to the signing of the judgment are relevant to the disposition of this appeal. They are as follows:

1. A judgment entitled “Order of Termination” was signed June 10, 1998.

*5632.A second judgment entitled “Reformed Order of Termination” was signed on July 1,1998.

3. On the face of the Reformed Order of Termination is the following hand written notation: “7-1-98 Set Aside later same date” which…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wang v. Hsu, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. TDCJ-ID, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  2. Harrison v. TDCJ-ID, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  3. In Re JMT, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  4. Miguel Bethencourt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API