Legal Opinion

People v. McCullum

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 20, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur M. Schack, J.

Defendant was charged with violating: Penal Law § 265.01 (2) (criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree); Penal Law § 120.14 (1) (menacing in the second degree); and Penal Law § 120.15 (menacing in the third degree). Defendant moves to dismiss this case for facial insufficiency pursuant to CPL 100.15 and 100.40 and also moves to suppress defendant’s *71statements and physical evidence. Additionally, defendant moves to dismiss the case pursuant to CPL 30.30, alleging that the complaint has not been properly converted to an information within 90…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. CavinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. LongshoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. SaundersNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People ex rel. Walker v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. People v. HarvinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WilkersonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
  2. People v. KilhullenNew York Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API