Tennessee v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Hood, D.J.,
WHITE, J. (pp. 614-15),, delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Municipalities in Tennessee and North Carolina providing broadband service would like to expand their networks be*600yond their current territorial boundaries to underserved nearby areas. The legislatures of Tennessee and North Carolina have passed laws either forbidding or putting onerous restrictions on such expansion by municipal telecommunications providers. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), citing its statutory mandates to remove barriers to broadband…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Columbus v. Ours Garage & Wrecker Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anthony Daunt v. Jocelyn BensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Phillips v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Local 3047 v. Hardin CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. SundquistUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Bank of America v. SundquistUtah Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.