Legal Opinion
MURRAY BISCUIT COMPANY, INC. v. Hutto
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 24, 1969No. 43851PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhakdt, Judge.
In a prior appeal we upheld the peti tion on the basis that the allegations were sufficient to place plaintiff in the status of a licensee; that liability in this class of case, as in that of trespassers, is only for wilful or wanton injury; and that it is usually wilful or wanton not to exercise ordinary care to prevent injuring a licensee who is actually known to be, or reasonably is expected to be, within the range of a dangerous act being done. Murray Biscuit Co. v. Hutto, 115 Ga. App. 870 (156 SE2d 132).
The first consideration on this appeal after trial must be given to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mandeville Mills v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Mayor of Milledgeville v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- McCall v. McCallieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Medi-Clean Services, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Huddle House, Inc. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Jones v. Monroe Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Feise v. Cherokee CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Feise v. Cherokee CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.