Dailey v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Pawhuska
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON. J.
This cause came on to tie heard upon a motion to dismiss filed by defendants in error upon the following grounds: stitute case-made was sustained, allowing fire days therefor, and defendants in error’s motion to dismiss denied; on February 9, 1923, original case-made and petition in error filed; on February 15, 1923, defendants in error renewed their motion to dismiss appeal, showing service by mail; on February 17, 1923, the plaintiff in error filed a motion to strike said second motion to dismiss; on March 6, 1923, said second motion to dismiss appeal was denied; on March 9,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Estates of HarknessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Buehl v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Simpson v. Henderson-Sturges Piano Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Oil Fields S. F. R. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Tarkenton v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amorita Milling Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Shepherd v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Short v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- School Board of District No. 4 v. YalchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Atkinson v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952