Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Pawhuska

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1923No. 13601PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON. J.

This cause came on to tie heard upon a motion to dismiss filed by defendants in error upon the following grounds: stitute case-made was sustained, allowing fire days therefor, and defendants in error’s motion to dismiss denied; on February 9, 1923, original case-made and petition in error filed; on February 15, 1923, defendants in error renewed their motion to dismiss appeal, showing service by mail; on February 17, 1923, the plaintiff in error filed a motion to strike said second motion to dismiss; on March 6, 1923, said second motion to dismiss appeal was denied; on March 9,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Estates of HarknessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Buehl v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Simpson v. Henderson-Sturges Piano Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Oil Fields S. F. R. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Tarkenton v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amorita Milling Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Shepherd v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Short v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. School Board of District No. 4 v. YalchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Atkinson v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API