State v. Hagler
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
¶1 Under chapter 10.99 RCW, certain crimes are designated by the prosecutor or the court as domestic violence crimes. It is neither necessary nor advisable to inform the jury that charges have been designated as domestic violence crimes under chapter 10.99 RCW. In this case, however, doing so was harmless. We affirm Warren Hagler’s convictions, rejecting his remaining claims. But because the court imposed a sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum, we remand for the court to correct the sentence.
BACKGROUND
¶2 In 2005, Hagler was a 40 year old man without a stable place to live. He met Magen…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BourgeoisWashington Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WinborneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. WinborneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. Abdi-IssaWashington Supreme Court · 2022
- State Of Washington v. Charmarke Abdi-issaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Donald L. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.