Legal Opinion
United States v. Tyson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 9, 2003No. 02-X-73808-DTPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States of America (the Government), filed its Application for Writ of Continuing Garnishment on September 23, 2002. The garnishment stems out of Defendant, Opal Tyson’s (Tyson), conviction in this Court, for which Tyson was ordered to pay restitution. Tyson filed a request for hearing on September 30, 2002. On October 1, 2002, this Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen for a hearing and determination on Tyson’s request for hearing. Garnishee, Ford Motor Company Retirement Trust (Ford Trust), filed an Answer to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. HalterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- General Motors Corporation v. David J. Buha and James B. Stone, County District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. AbdelhadiDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. CagleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- United States v. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007