Legal Opinion

Richmond Bros. v. Richardson

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided January 14, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In the matter of the Priegle Paint Company, bankrupt. On petition .to review order of referee denying petitions of Richmond Bros, and the Blackburn Varnish Company, respectively, to reclaim property.

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This matter came on for hearing on a petition to review an order of the referee in bankruptcy, disallowing two petitions for reclamation of certain goods furnished the bankrupt by the petitioners, Richmond Bros, and the Blackburn Varnish Company. Each petition presents the same question. Petitioners testify that they started the bankrupt in business, under an arrangement by which the goods were furnished to it, title to be retained in sellers until the goods were sold, for the purpose of their security, the bankrupt to have the right to sell at such prices and on such…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ballard v. . BurgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Brackett v. . HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. In re GarcewichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Marx Tailoring Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1912
  2. In re Regealed Ice Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1911
  3. Kaplan v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API