Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ferris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We are satisfied that the evidence shows that the instrument presented by the petitioner, the appellant herein, for probate as the last will and testament of Ellen M. Bennett, deceased, bearing date October 16,1906, was revoked by a subsequent will duly *638made and executed by the testatrix on or about March 16, 1908, which last-mentioned will contained a clause revoking all former wills made by her. The evidence further shows that this last will after its execution was by testatrix’s direction retained by the attorney who drew it, in whose custody it remained for some two years; and at her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collyer v. . CollyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Baumann v. . SteingesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. In re the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re FordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of GethinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  3. In re the Estate of MooreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. Cooley v. CooleyNew York Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API